If Apple would release the APFS documentation that explains how to create and manipulate APFS volumes, then we would see if directory tree optimization would have the same effect that it does on HSF+.Īpple holding back the APFS documentation is not for a lack of resources on their part. Buy OEM Alsoft DiskWarrior 5 - Discount price - 49.95 Enter their high scores, but must start the game from will also enhance his. Things have obviously changed significantly under the hood with APFS. () Note: When rebuilding HFS+ (Mac OS Extended) formatted external volumes. All users of DiskWarrior 5.0 and 5.1 should download this update. Even though an SSD is significantly faster, for HFS+ the same issue applies because it is the CPU that is transversing the directory tree where seek time plays no part. Cheapest Alsoft DiskWarrior 5 - BIG Sale - 49.95 I encountered two additional, but easily resolvable, issues. Update DiskWarrior 5.0 and 5.1 to version 5.2 for compatibility with macOS 10.14 Mojave, macOS 10.15 Catalina and earlier. In my experience, when there is more than 30% fragmentation in the directory catalog, you really begin to see a significant slow down because the CPU has to traverse all the patches in order to get to what it wants. Over time, the directory tree gets so unbalanced that it becomes “computationally” inefficient. 1 of 5 stars 2 of 5 stars 3 of 5 stars 4 of 5 stars 5 of 5 stars. Whenever you make a change to an old HFS+ volume, the OS has to patch the directory tree for the update. SDD’s aren’t burdened by this, so directory optimization is probably not as important as it used to be with the proliferation of solid state drives. Part of what make directory optimization more efficient is that it cut down on seek times that hard drives are saddled with.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |